Showing 1 - 10 of 11
One feature of legislative bargaining in naturally occurring settings is that the distribution of seats or voting weights often does not accurately reflect bargaining power. Game-theoretic predictions about payoffs and coalition formation are insensitive to nominal differences in vote...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012822445
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012627037
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012320956
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012226746
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015076007
In many bargaining situations, the distribution of seats or voting weights does not accurately reflect bargaining power. Maaser, Paetzel and Traub (Games and Economic Behavior, 2019) conducted an experiment to investigate the effect of such nominal power differences in the classic Baron-Ferejohn...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013171871
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001756389
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011646568
Weighted committees allow shareholders, party leaders, etc. to wield different numbers of votes or voting weights as they decide between multiple candidates by a given social choice method. We consider committees that apply scoring methods such as plurality, Borda, or antiplurality rule. Many...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012698221
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013432566