Showing 1 - 10 of 16
We model a dynamic public good contribution game, where players are (naturally) formed into groups. The groups are exogenously placed in a sequence, with limited information available to players about their groups’ position in the sequence. Contribution decisions are made by players...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014237520
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012167674
We run a laboratory experiment with a two-person game with unique pure Nash equilibrium which is also the solution of the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies. The subjects are asked to commit to a device that randomly picks one of three symmetric outcomes in this game...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011962034
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012309893
Gallice and Monzón (2019) present a natural environment that sustains full cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. They demonstrate that in a sequential public goods game, where agents lack knowledge of their position in the sequence but can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015375321
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014287835
Gallice and Monzón (2019) present a natural environment that sustains full cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas among a finite number of self-interested agents. They demonstrate that in a sequential public goods game, where agents lack knowledge of their position in the sequence but can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015375388
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015425354
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554327
In this paper, we investigate behavior in two-player sequential-move contests with complete and incomplete information about the value of the prize, theoretically and experimentally. First, we describe a Bayesian equilibrium of a sequential contest in which both players have private prize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014237552