Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003736829
This paper suggests a potential rationale for the recent empirical finding that overconfident agents tend to self-select into more competitive environments (e.g. Dohmen and Falk, 2006). In particular, it shows that moderate overconfidence in a contest can improve the agent's performance relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014199669
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009241537
This paper suggests a potential rationale for the recent empirical finding that overconfident agents tend to self-select into more competitive environments (e.g. Dohmen and Falk, forthcoming). In particular, it shows that moderate overconfidence in a contest can improve the agent's performance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008757370
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008906901
This paper shows how conflicting normative views of fair contribution rules can be used to design sequential contribution mechanisms to foster human cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Our model predicts that a sequential mechanism which solicits contributions first from wealthy actors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010339938
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011646013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014547159
We study the possibilities for agenda manipulation under strategic voting for two prominent sequential voting procedures: the amendment procedure and the suc- cessive procedure. We show that a well known result for tournaments, namely that the successive procedure is (weakly) more manipulable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011704808