Showing 1 - 10 of 10
We introduce a novel framework to predict the relative accuracy of sell-side analysts' annual earnings forecasts out-of-sample. Prior studies only evaluate forecasts shortly before the corresponding earnings release. In contrast, our study is the first to provide long-term predictions which are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012956259
Analysts who provide more accurate earnings forecasts also issue more profitable recommendations. We demonstrate how investors can profit from this contemporaneous link by differentiating between “able” and “lucky” analysts. In line with previous studies, we find that past track records...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115077
We examine the role of macroeconomic announcements in shaping the earnings forecasts of equity market analysts. We find that earnings forecasts strongly respond to macroeconomic releases signaling changes in overall business conditions after controlling for analysts' learning from firm- and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013109000
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010227839
Analysts providing more accurate earnings forecasts also issue more profitable recommendations. We demonstrate how investors can profit from this contemporaneous link by differentiating between "able" and "lucky" analysts. In line with previous studies, we find that past track records alone are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009705474
We document that investors can actually profit from the contemporaneous link between earnings accuracy and recommendation profitability (Loh and Mian (2006)). Differentiating between "able" and "lucky" analysts we suggest an implementable, i.e. look-ahead bias free, trading strategy that yields...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008696828
We analyze three different mechanical models to forecast earnings and compare their forecasts with those of analysts. Moreover, we evaluate implied cost of capital (ICC) estimates that are based on these forecasts. With our analyses we answer three open questions in the literature. 1) Do model...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901020
Recent findings indicate that macroeconomic survey forecasts are anchoring biased and therefore are inefficient. However, despite highly significant test coefficients a bias adjustment does not improve forecasts' quality. We find that the cognitive bias is a statistical artifact and that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115740
Recent findings indicate that macroeconomic survey forecasts are anchoring biased and therefore are inefficient. However, despite highly significant test coefficients a bias adjustment does not improve forecasts' quality. We find that the cognitive bias is a statistical artifact because the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013100577
We analyze the quality of macroeconomic survey forecasts. Recent findings indicate that they are anchoring biased. This irrationality would challenge the results of a wide range of empirical studies, e.g., in asset pricing, volatility clustering or market liquidity, which rely on survey data to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009270413