Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We find that the audit report lag is significantly higher for former Andersen clients (that did not follow their Andersen partner to the new audit firm) than for clients voluntarily changing auditors from another Big 5 predecessor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the first year with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013068286
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009757450
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008839874
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011687251
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012237572
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734349
Many studies report that audit fees are discounted in the year of an auditor change and regulators have long been concerned that such fee discounting could impair audit quality. We find significant bias in the way studies have tested for fee discounting. The bias exists because interim...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014103108
In a highly influential analysis, Lawrence, Minutti-Meza, and Zhang (2011), LMZ henceforth, report that statistically significant relations between a firm's choice of a Big N auditor and three audit quality metrics (discretionary accruals, cost equity capital, and analyst forecast accuracy) turn...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012845123