Showing 1 - 10 of 1,307
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) proscribes so-called “affiliated hires” of financial executives. More specifically, SOX requires that firms wait at least one year before hiring an individual recently employed as a member of the firm’s external audit team. The intent of the regulation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014216836
We provide evidence on the long standing concern on auditor conflicts of interest from providing non-audit services (NAS) to audit clients by using rarely explored NAS fee data from 1978-80. Using this earlier setting, we find cross-sectional evidence of improved earnings quality when auditors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014177281
This study analyzes audit fees following SOX, in particular, the residual increase in audit fees controlling for those factors predicted to change such fees but for the Act. We find significant relations between residual audit fees and incremental audit risk, audit effort, and auditor changes....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014050559
This paper offers new findings on the relation between auditor dismissals and resignations and audit fees. Unlike the prior research, which studies the fees of auditors after an auditor change, we focus on audit fees before an auditor change. Our evidence shows that incumbent auditors charge...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014218525
This study provides evidence that auditors adopted risk-management policies in the early 1990's in order to reduce their exposure to legal liability. Specifically, there is evidence that their clienteles became less risky and evidence of more conservative auditor reporting policies by non-Big 6...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014109901
This paper summarizes the Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 106 – Audit Evidence. It extends the importance on why the financial statements should be fairly stated and in conformity, in all material respects, with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Also, extends why audit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013066158
We provide evidence of the impact of Auditing Standard No. 2 (“AS 2”), issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SarBox”), on the outcome of auditors in financial reporting litigation. Specifically, we focus on the existence of financial restatements and how and why they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013049126
We investigate the association between financial restatements and internal controls by examining whether voluntary restatement decisions are associated with internal control quality. We focus on companies' voluntary restatements because they are more susceptible to the numerous provisions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013063005
We provide evidence on the long standing concern on auditor conflicts of interest from providing non-audit services (NAS) to audit clients by using rarely explored NAS fee data from 1978-80 Using this earlier setting, we find cross-sectional evidence of improved earnings quality when auditors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009241457
This paper assesses the effects of auditor dismissals and resignations on audit fees and, in particular, whether companies pay more or less for their audits around these events. We also test the hypotheses that the fee discount around a dismissal can be explained by the benefits of auditor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014066778