Showing 1 - 10 of 16,695
This paper discusses the question whether self-learning price-setting algorithms are able to coordinate their pricing behaviour to achieve a collusive outcome that maximizes the joint profits of the firms using these algorithms. While the legal literature generally assumes that algorithmic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012912903
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011886983
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011571944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014543430
We analyze the effects of better algorithmic demand forecasting on collusive profits. We show that the comparative statics crucially depend on the whether actions are observable. Thus, the optimal antitrust policy needs to take into account the institutional settings of the industry in question....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012990230
Classic artificial intelligence (Q-learning) algorithms have been capable of consistently learning supra-competitive pricing strategies in infinitely repeated Nash-Bertrand pricing games without human communication. Such algorithms have been able to converge due to the temporal correlation of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014344267
Sophisticated collusive compensation schemes such as assigning future market shares or direct transfers are frequently observed in detected cartels. We show formally why these schemes are useful for dampening deviation incentives when colluding firms are temporary asymmetric. The relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012698813
Sophisticated collusive compensation schemes such as assigning future market shares or direct transfers are frequently observed in detected cartels. We show formally why these schemes are useful for dampening deviation incentives when colluding firms are temporary asymmetric. The relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012704975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012022643
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014544122