Showing 1 - 10 of 12
The two leading merger systems - those of the United States and the European Union - treat the potential benefits and risks of mergers asymmetrically. Both systems require considerably greater proof of efficiencies than they do of potential harms if the efficiencies are to offset concerns over...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013128868
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000710934
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015178343
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012619833
In Lundbeck the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court’s judgment that a merger involving the only two drugs approved for treating a serious heart condition in infants was lawful. Although the drugs treated the same condition they were not bioequivalents. The Eighth Circuit approved the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014175163
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970980
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013113833
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013069146
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899993
Since the Supreme Court's landmark 1963 decision in Philadelphia National Bank, antitrust challengers have mounted prima facie cases against horizontal mergers that rested on the level and increase in market concentration caused by the merger, with proponents of the merger then permitted to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012932645