Showing 1 - 10 of 93
We study experimentally a two-stage compensation mechanism for promoting cooperation in prisoner's dilemma games. In stage 1, players simultaneously choose binding non-negative amounts to pay their counterparts for cooperating in a given prisoner's dilemma game, and then play the prisoner's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014057940
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003920298
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010511358
This paper reviews experiments that include two types of subjects: professionals and students. The typical subject pool for economic experiments is composed of students. Professionals are loosely defined as people working in an industry where the game under study is thought to be relevant. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014176902
We investigate the Baron-Ferejohn (1989a) bargaining model of legislative behavior comparing open versus closed amendment rules. The data are qualitatively consistent with the theory as there are longer delays in distributing benefits and a more egalitarian distribution of benefits under the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014120545
This paper uses a laboratory experiment to study beliefs and their relationship to action and strategy choices in finitely and indefinitely repeated prisoners' dilemma games. We find subjects' beliefs about the other player's action are accurate despite some systematic deviations corresponding...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013237492
This paper uses a laboratory experiment to study beliefs and their relationship to action and strategy choices in finitely and indefinitely repeated prisoners' dilemma games. We find subjects' beliefs about the other player's action are accurate despite some systematic deviations corresponding...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013238795
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012820347
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009235920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008935951