Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011484372
We expand upon the previous models of inequity aversion of Fehr and Schmidt [1], and Frohlich et al. [2], which assume that dictators get disutility if the final allocation of surplus deviates from the equal split (egalitarian principle) or from the subjects' production (libertarian principle)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009754116
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009580042
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009737463
We report on a large experiment testing the role of moral preferences in one-shot, anonymous ultimatum and impunity games, which vary the veto power of responders: in the impunity game, if an offer is lower than the responder's minimum acceptable offer, the proposer still receives his share,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014358241
We report on a large, pre-registered experiment testing the role of moral preferences in oneshot, anonymous ultimatum and impunity games, which vary the veto power of responders. We measure moral preferences in two ways: through a decision problem with real economic consequences (the trade-off...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013293250
We report on a large, pre-registered, experiment testing the role of moral preferences in the ultimatum and the impunity games, which vary the veto power of responders. We measure moral preferences in two ways: through a decision problem with real economic consequences (the trade-off game), and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013210989
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011701875