Showing 1 - 10 of 23
It is well known that delegating the play of a game to an agent via incentive contracts may serve as a commitment device and hence provide a strategic advantage. Previous literature has shown that any Nash equilibrium outcome of an extensive-form principals-only game can be supported as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014216262
This paper characterizes equilibrium outcomes of extensive form games with incomplete information in which players can sign renegotiable contracts with third-parties. Our aim is to understand the extent to which third-party contracts can be used as commitment devices when it is impossible to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010222351
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011409065
It is well known that delegating the play of a game to an agent via incentive contracts may serve as a commitment device and hence provide a strategic advantage. Previous literature has shown that any Nash equilibrium outcome of an extensive-form principals-only game can be supported as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012001777
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003549441
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003445231
I present a model in which the players of a game have the option to delegate parts of their strategies to a third party who has an interest in the outcome of the game. I analyze whether the game with delegation to a common agent improves over the equilibrium of the original game. This paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012725944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001489484
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000968802
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000983299