Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Overconfidence has been a hot topic in judgment and decision-making research. The overconfidence effect describes, among other things, the tendency of people to believe that their judgment is more accurate than it really is. Auditing judgment and decision making research has always had much...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014197889
Most audit fieldwork is not conducted by a single auditor but by a team of auditors. Researchers have, however, focused heavily on the judgment and decision-making of individual auditors, ignoring the multi-person reality in which auditors have to make judgments and decisions. This study...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204627
Women are still a minority in the audit profession, especially at the partner level. An increasing amount of literature has explored the sources of this gender inequality. Past studies have, however, neglected the possibility that the processes that lead to the (re)production of gender...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014158669
In a large-scale laboratory experiment, we investigate gender differences in overconfidence and risk taking. Our results show that (self-)selection and socialization can eliminate the gender difference in overconfidence, but they appear insufficient to create environments in which women are as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013083074
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009729147
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011409628
Audit quality is a much studied issue. Recently, various auditing researchers have looked at the idea that audit quality may be systematically related to the auditor being male or female. Although this seams a genuine research question, the approach adopted by these researchers (incorporating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013131434
Previous research has hinted a potential impact of auditor gender on audit quality. It appears that, for example, men are less risk-averse than women. Female auditors may, therefore, express more severe audit opinions than male auditors. This paper addresses a potential major bias underlying the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207679
Al-Shaer and Harakeh (2020) and Lopatta et al. (2020) study different aspects of the relationship between board gender diversity and corporate outcomes, respectively executive compensation and non-financial performance. In this discussion, we offer a broad overview of the main results of both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012831720
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012293348