Showing 1 - 10 of 16
We report an experiment examining risk taking and information aggregation in groups. Group members come to the table with an individual preference for a choice under risk, based on privately received information, and can share this information with fellow group members. They then make a decision...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010371298
We report a controlled laboratory experiment examining risk-taking and information aggregation in groups facing a common risk. The experiment allows us to examine how subjects respond to new information, in the form of both privately observed signals and signals reported from others. We find...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010515798
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011474825
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011506831
Previous experiments have found a moderate, positive effect of group size on cooperation in voluntary contribution mechanism (VCM) games. This effect has been typically observed in experiments with groups of size 4 or more, and contrasts with results from n-person prisoner's dilemma and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009687484
We study the effect of group size on cooperation in voluntary contribution mechanism games. As in previous experiments, we study four- and eight-person groups in high and low marginal per capita return (MPCR) conditions. We find a positive effect of group size in the low MPCR condition, as in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009772221
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001517526
Two laboratory experiments - one a statistical urn problem, the other a monetary policy experiment - were run to test the commonly-believed hypothesis that groups make decisions more slowly than individuals do. Surprisingly, this turns out not to be true there is no significant difference in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013247633
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003833306
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003834647