Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Proposition 209, enacted in California in 1996 and made effective the following year, ended state affirmative action programs not only in education, but also for public employment and government contracting. This paper uses CPS data and triple difference techniques to take advantage of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003129994
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003459432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001438893
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003837254
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003384600
I implement event study and difference-in-differences research designs to measure the causal effects of mandatory waiting periods for abortions, distinguishing between "one- trip" waiting periods that allow counseling and information to be provided remotely and "two-trip" waiting periods that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012549493
We use difference-in-differences research designs to estimate the effects of abortion bans on births at the county level, leveraging data on changes in driving distance and appointment availability at the nearest facility where abortion remains legal. We find that bans alone increase births, but...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015361423
Proposition 209, enacted in California in 1996 and made effective the following year, ended state affirmative action programs not only in education, but also for public employment and government contracting. This paper uses CPS data and triple difference techniques to take advantage of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318382
An important claim made for affirmative action programs has been that they need not be permanent: they can be discontinued, the argument runs, once they have transformed employers’ attitudes. Proposition 209, enacted in California in 1996 and made effective the following year, represents a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014182270