Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Antitrust policy involves not just the regulation of anti-competitive behavior, but also an important deterrence effect. Neither scholars nor policymakers have fully researched the deterrence effects of merger policy tools, as they have been unable to empirically measure these effects. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014224731
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003886130
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003547994
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003686213
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003906997
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014564283
We estimate the deterrence effects of U.S. merger policy instruments with respect to the composition and frequency of future merger notifications. Data from the Annual Reports by the U.S. DOJ and FTC allow industry based measures over the 1986-1999 period of the conditional probabilities for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013122386
We show that the number of merger proposals (frequency-based deterrence) is a more appropriate indicator of underlying changes in merger policy than the relative anti-competitiveness of merger proposals (composition-based deterrence). This has strong implications for the empirical analysis of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013155108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009261160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010190655