Showing 1 - 10 of 13
We use a new Australian longitudinal income tax dataset, Alife, covering 1991–2017, to examine levels and trends in the persistence in top-income group membership, focussing on the top 1%. We summarize persistence in multiple ways, documenting levels and trends in rates of remaining in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012624662
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012793003
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011313188
In this paper we propose a framework to study changes in the redistributive consequences of income taxes and transfers. In contrast with previous approaches the new method allows decomposition of the change in the redistributive impact into four components: the immediate effect of changes in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010700789
In this paper we propose a framework to study changes in the redistributive consequences of income taxes and transfers. In contrast with previous approaches the new method allows decomposition of the change in the redistributive impact into four components: the immediate effect of changes in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013073992
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010210542
Jenkins and Van Kerm (2006) show how income inequality trends can be explained by income mobility and the equalising effect of panel-income changes. This paper extends their framework to show explicitly how the distributional effect of panel-income changes depends on the respective size and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013018031
Atkinson, Piketty, and Saez (2011) survey an important new literature using income taxbased data to measure the share of income held by top income groups. But changes in tax legislation that expand the tax base to include income sources (e.g. capital gains, dividends, etc.) disproportionately...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014156064
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009766979
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009770143