Showing 1 - 10 of 11
This paper analyzes the political economy of productivity-related policymaking in Chile following a political transaction cost model (Spiller and Tommasi, 2003; Murillo et al., 2008). The main findings indicate that i) the Chilean policymaking process (PMP) was successful in the 1990s in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010328251
This paper analyzes the political economy of productivity-related policymaking in Chile following a political transaction cost model (Spiller and Tommasi, 2003; Murillo et al., 2008). The main findings indicate that i) the Chilean policymaking process (PMP) was successful in the 1990s in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008478857
This paper continues the empirical research line started by Crepon et al. (Crepon, B., Duguet, E. and Mairesse, J. (1998) Research, Innovation, and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115-158.) about the impact of research...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005269520
The role of market competition on firm innovation remains a controversial question, especially in the context of developing countries. This paper presents new empirical evidence about the causal impact of competition on firm innovation, and the effectiveness of competition law enforcement in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013291186
A large literature asserts that standard essential patents (SEPs) allow their owners to “hold up” innovation by charging fees that exceed their incremental contribution to a final product. We evaluate two central, interrelated predictions of this SEP hold-up hypothesis: (1) SEP-reliant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014136719
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011415344
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010526760
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011660514
A large literature asserts that standard essential patents (SEPs) allow their owners to "hold up" innovation by charging fees that exceed their incremental contribution to a final product. We evaluate two central, interrelated predictions of this SEP hold-up hypothesis: (1) SEP-reliant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012457576
A large literature asserts that standard essential patents (SEPs) allow their owners to “hold up” innovation by charging fees that exceed their incremental contribution to a final product. We evaluate two central, interrelated predictions of this SEP hold-up hypothesis: (1) SEP-reliant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013024504