Showing 1 - 10 of 22
We examine the unintended consequences of the 2005 increase from $500 million to $1 billion in the asset threshold for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) internal control reporting requirements. We focus on a test sample of banks that increased their total assets...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013063095
The scandals surrounding questionable accounting practices and corporate wrongdoing during 2000-2008 have often been attributed to the lack of effective internal controls. We examine the relations between national culture and the incidence and the number of reported internal control material...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012972881
We examine the unintended consequences of the 2005 increase in the asset threshold for FDICIA internal control reporting requirements from $500 million to $1 billion. We focus on a test sample of banks that grew from between $100 million to $500 million in assets prior to the change in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857350
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) of 1991 was designed, among other things, to introduce risk-based deposit insurance, increase capital requirements, and improve banks' internal controls. Of particular interest in this study are the requirements for annual audit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013076698
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003919502
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009705611
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010342196
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011429516
We investigate the association between material weakness in internal controls (MW) disclosed under Section 302 of SOX and future stock price crash risk. We argue that relative to firms with effective internal controls, firms with MW have lower financial reporting precision. The lower reporting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012854423
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012170082