Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Disruption of function of left, but not right, lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) increased choices of immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards. rTMS did not change choices involving only delayed rewards or valuation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014175638
Disruption of function of left, but not right, lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) increased choices of immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards. RTMS did not change choices involving only delayed rewards or valuation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014175763
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014473505
Time preferences for financial and air quality gains and losses at delays of up to 50 years were elicited using three different methods: matching, fixed-sequence choice titration, and a dynamic "multiple staircase" choice method. Results indicate that the choice-based methods are prone to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013118331
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010196968
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009579812
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010489699
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009611953
Intertemporal tradeoffs are ubiquitous in decision making, yet preferences for current versus future losses are rarely explored in empirical research. Whereas rational-economic theory posits that neither outcome sign (gains vs. losses) nor outcome magnitude (small vs. large) should affect delay...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014174452
People discount delayed gains (where the default is to receive a smaller gain sooner) more than accelerated gains (where the default is to receive a larger gain later). For losses, the pattern is reversed – people discount delayed losses less than accelerated losses. In Study 1, confirming a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014042654