Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Time preferences for financial and air quality gains and losses at delays of up to 50 years were elicited using three different methods: matching, fixed-sequence choice titration, and a dynamic "multiple staircase" choice method. Results indicate that the choice-based methods are prone to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013118331
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010196968
Three studies explored the effects of uncertainty on people's time preferences for financial gains and losses. In general, individuals seek to avoid uncertainty in situations of intertemporal choice. While holding the expected value of payouts constant, participants preferred immediate gains and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011862320
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011785256
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011647373
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009611953
Intertemporal tradeoffs are ubiquitous in decision making, yet preferences for current versus future losses are rarely explored in empirical research. Whereas rational-economic theory posits that neither outcome sign (gains vs. losses) nor outcome magnitude (small vs. large) should affect delay...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014174452
People discount delayed gains (where the default is to receive a smaller gain sooner) more than accelerated gains (where the default is to receive a larger gain later). For losses, the pattern is reversed – people discount delayed losses less than accelerated losses. In Study 1, confirming a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014042654