Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013171143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009745213
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010401368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010357094
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011285633
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011480495
In a standard four factor framework, mutual fund return volatility is a reliable, persistent, and powerful predictor of future abnormal returns. However, the abnormal returns are eliminated by the addition of a “vol” anomaly factor contrasting returns on portfolios of low and high volatility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013034588
The top 5 percent of actively managed U.S. equity mutual funds in 2012 had greater aggregate TNA than the remaining 95 percent of funds combined. This skewness in size has implications for mutual fund research: What is true of the average fund is not necessarily true of the average dollar. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013067588
We make use of a unique dataset of SEC Form N-SAR filings to examine the gross flows of U.S. bond funds. We find that gross inflows and outflows average around 4% of TNA per month, but net flows average only 0.26%. When modeling these flows, we see that, like equity funds, bond fund investors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013090042
We study the universe of absolute return mutual funds and find no evidence they deliver positive alpha. Additionally, these funds can have significant factor exposures. Compared to ordinary equity funds, absolute return funds have much higher fees and turnover. They perform worse than their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091577