Using an updated Japanese sample covering the 1975-2006 period, we reexamine whether it is Fama and French's (1993) three-factor model or Daniel and Titman's (1997) characteristic model that better explains stock returns in the Japanese market. In contrast to Daniel, Titman, and Wei (2001), we...

Based on an errors-in-variables-free approach proposed by Brennan, Chordia, and Subrahmanyam (1998), we investigate the competing explanatory abilities of alternative multi-factor models in examining various asset-pricing anomalies using Japanese data over 1978-2006. Surprisingly, we find that...