Showing 1 - 8 of 8
The opportunity to voice one's opinion about a decision is a fundamental aspect of procedural fairness and applies to a large variety of economic interactions. Voice may influence decision makers, but at the same time it shapes behavior of those who can voice their opinion. We study the latter...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10009771811
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10010527441
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011719140
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011616239
We study experimentally whether and to what extent impartial decision makers are influenced by stakeholders’ fairness opinions in an allocation decision. The setting allows for different focal fairness rules to be considered. We compare communication treatments, in which one of the...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014147415
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10010504707
Automated decision-making in legal contexts is often perceived as less fair than its human counterpart. This human-automation fairness gap poses practical challenges for implementing automated systems in the public sector. Drawing on experimental data from 4,250 participants in three public...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014634695
How fair are government decisions based on algorithmic predictions? And to what extent can the government delegate decisions to machines without sacrificing procedural fairness? Using a set of vignettes in the context of predictive policing, school admissions, and refugee-matching, we explore...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10013252892