Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009518389
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003965729
This paper shows that the effects of employment protection critically depend on its enforcement. For this purpose, we capture evasion of employment protection via market exit in a setting of monopolistic competition. We find that the number of firms entering the market depends on firing costs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003730300
Employers who use temporary agency staff in contrast to regular staff are not affected byemployment protection regulations when terminating a job. Therefore, services providedby temporary work agencies may be seen as a substitute for regular employment. In thispaper, we analyze the effects of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866162
This paper shows that the effects of employment protection critically depend on its enforcement. For this purpose, we capture evasion of employment protection via market exit in a setting of monopolistic competition. We find that the number of firms entering the market depends on firing costs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010264396
Employers who use temporary agency staff in contrast to regular staff are not affected by employment protection regulations when terminating a job. Therefore, services provided by temporary work agencies may be seen as a substitute for regular employment. In this paper, we analyze the effects of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010298743
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009355359
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009691995
Employers who use temporary agency staff in contrast to regular staff are not affected byemployment protection regulations when terminating a job. Therefore, services providedby temporary work agencies may be seen as a substitute for regular employment. In thispaper, we analyze the effects of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003794107
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003401375