Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009674148
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009710969
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011914779
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011691083
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011877634
Performance measures such as alpha and the Sharpe ratio are typically based on sample returns net of fees. This implies the same weighing to sample returns and to fees. However, sample return parameters are noisy estimates of true parameters, while fees are known with certainty. Thus, intuition...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012950555
Asness et. al. (2018) recently resurrect the size effect, concluding that it “…should be restored as one of the central cross-sectional empirical anomalies for asset pricing theory to explain”. We suggest a theoretical explanation for the size effect, based on the observation that many...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012871783
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012659656
Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Criteria for Mutual Fund Selection -- Chapter 3: Investment for Intermediate and Long Horizons -- Chapter 4: Estimating Future Performance – The Shrinkage Adjusted Sharpe Ratio -- Chapter 5: Active Versus Passive Investment -- Chapter 6: Target Date Funds,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015072141
The Black-Scholes model and many of its extensions imply a log-normal distribution of stock returns. However, for holding periods of up to a year, the empirical return distribution (both conditional and unconditional) is not log-normal, but rather much closer to the logistic distribution. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013046952