Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009309803
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014375454
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015179566
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011590910
In this paper, we find that the upside asymmetry calculated based on a new distribution-based asymmetry measure proposed by Jiang, Wu, Zhou, and Zhu (2020) is negatively related to average future returns in the crosssection of Chinese stock returns. By contrast, when using a conventional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013239557
In the Chinese stock market, we find that the cross-sectional relation between value-at-risk (VaR) and expected returns is unclear, which is different from the recent findings in the United States. Additionally, VaR is negatively related with expected returns and cannot be explained by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013252013
In this paper, we propose two asymmetry measures for stock returns. Unlike the popular skewness measure, our measures are based on the distribution function of the data rather than just the third central moment. We present empirical evidence that greater upside asymmetries calculated using our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012856008
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012231316
In this paper, we find that the idiosyncratic volatility (IV) effect on expected returns exists and cannot be explained by other variables in the Chinese stock market. The Chinese stock market launched margin trading in March 2010. We therefore study the margin trading target and non-margin...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012851324
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013380678