Showing 1 - 10 of 22
In this paper we show that the testable implications derived in Huber and Mellace (2013) are the best possible to detect invalid instruments, in the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects and endogeneity. We also provide a formal proof of the fact that those testable implications are only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014137581
In heterogeneous treatment effect models with endogeneity, identification of the LATE typically relies on the availability of an exogenous instrument monotonically related to treatment participation. We demonstrate that a strictly weaker local monotonicity condition identifies the LATEs on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012963091
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014391694
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014435314
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013327202
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013328069
In many empirical problems, the evaluation of treatment effects is complicated by sample selection such that the outcome is only observed for a non-random subpopulation. In the absence of instruments and/or tight parametric assumptions, treatment effects are not point identified, but can be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009508750
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010508523
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010437535
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010437539