Showing 1 - 10 of 11
This article proposes different tests for treatment effect heterogeneity when the outcome of interest, typically a duration variable, may be right-censored. The proposed tests study whether a policy 1) has zero distributional (average) effect for all subpopulations defined by covariate values,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014123930
One of the perceived advantages of difference-in-differences (DiD) methods is that they do not explicitly restrict how units select into treatment. However, when justifying DiD, researchers often argue that the treatment is "quasi-randomly" assigned. We investigate what selection mechanisms are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013362377
This paper proposes new estimators for the propensity score that aim to maximize the covariate distribution balance among different treatment groups. Heuristically, our proposed procedure attempts to estimate a propensity score model by making the underlying covariate distribution of different...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012851228
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012303538
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012587986
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012483192
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013275434
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013464658
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014471452
This paper analyzes difference-in-differences designs with a continuous treatment. We show that treatment effect on the treated-type parameters can be identified under a generalized parallel trends assumption that is similar to the binary treatment setup. However, interpreting differences in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014486209