Showing 1 - 10 of 26
While the limiting null distributions of cointegration tests are invariant to a certain amount of conditional heteroskedasticity as long as global homoskedasticity conditions are fulfilled, they are certainly affected when the innovations exhibit time-varying volatility. Worse yet, distortions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009672473
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011969530
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003963300
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009633336
We use meta analytic combination procedures to develop new tests for panel cointegration. The main idea consists in combining p-values from time series cointegration tests on the different units of the panel. The tests are robust to heterogeneity as well as to cross-sectional dependence between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394598
Time series cointegration tests, even in the presence of large sample sizes, often yield conflicting conclusions ("mixed signalsʺ) as measured by, inter alia, a low correlation of empirical p-values [see Gregory et al., 2004, Journal of Applied Econometrics]. Using their methodology, we present...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394608
We propose new tests for panel cointegration by extending the panel unit root of Choi [2001] and Maddala and Wu [1999] to the panel cointegration case. The tests are flexible, intuitively appealing and relatively easy to compute. We investigate the finite sample behavior in a simulation study....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003482776
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003948827
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011291306
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013347934