Showing 1 - 10 of 11
We experimentally investigate whether the procedural history of a sanctioning institution affects cooperation in a social dilemma. Subjects inherit the institutional setting from a previous generation of subjects who either decided on the implementation of the institution democratically by...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012902398
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011719149
We experimentally investigate whether the procedural history of a sanctioning institution affects cooperation in a social dilemma. Subjects inherit the institutional setting from a previous generation of subjects who either decided on the implementation of the institution democratically by...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011587713
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10012171011
If two players of a simultaneous symmetric one-shot prisoner's dilemma hold standard prefer-ences, the fact that choosing the cooperative move imposes harm on a passive outsider is imma-terial. Yet if participants hold social preferences, one might think that they are reticent to impose harm on...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10010286690
Both in the field and in the lab, participants frequently cooperate, despite the fact that the situation can be modelled as a simultaneous, symmetric prisoner's dilemma. This experiment manipulates the payoff in case both players defect, and explains the degree of cooperation by a combination of...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10010323844
Both in the field and in the lab, participants frequently cooperate, despite the fact that the situation can be modelled as a simultaneous, symmetric prisoner’s dilemma. This experiment manipulates the payoff in case both players defect, and explains the degree of cooperation by a combination...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10014166486
If two players of a simultaneous symmetric one-shot prisoner's dilemma hold standard prefer-ences, the fact that choosing the cooperative move imposes harm on a passive outsider is imma-terial. Yet if participants hold social preferences, one might think that they are reticent to impose harm on...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10009490177
Both in the field and in the lab, participants frequently cooperate, despite the fact that the situation can be modelled as a simultaneous, symmetric prisoner’s dilemma. This experiment manipulates the payoff in case both players defect, and explains the degree of cooperation by a combination...
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10009573481
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011296505