Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Assume that players strictly rank each other as coalition partners. We propose a procedure whereby they "fall back" on their preferences, yielding internally compatible, or coherent, majority coalition(s), which we call fallback coalitions. If there is more than one fallback coalition, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008810998
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011900905
This paper provides a first insight into cost sharing rules for the continuous knapsack problem. Assuming a set of divisible items with weights from which a knapsack with a certain weight constraint is to be filled, different such (classes of) rules are discussed. Those - based on individual...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014156108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001574701
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001555893
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001696037
We show that a cooperative outcome — one that is at least next-best for the players — is not a Nash equilibrium (NE) in 19 of the 57 2 x 2 strict ordinal conflict games (33%), including Prisoners’ Dilemma and Chicken. Auspiciously, in 16 of these games (84%), cooperative outcomes are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014108979
We show that a cooperative outcome—one that is at least next-best for the players—is not a Nash equilibrium (NE) in 19 of the 57 2 x 2 strict ordinal conflict games (33%), including Prisoners' Dilemma and Chicken. Auspiciously, in 16 of these games (84%), cooperative outcomes are nonmyopic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012921117
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009756604
Assume that players strictly rank each other as coalition partners. We propose a procedure whereby they 'fall back' on their preferences, yielding internally compatible, or coherent, majority coalition(s), which we call fallback coalitions. If there is more than one fallback coalition, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013157458