Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001677355
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009234652
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003851564
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011765172
The literature on congressional committees has largely overlooked the impact of jurisdictional fights on policy proposals and outcomes. This paper develops a theory of how legislators balance the benefits of expanded committee jurisdiction against preferred policy outcomes. It shows why a)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012461486
The literature on congressional committees has largely overlooked the impact of jurisdictional fights on policy proposals and outcomes. This paper develops a theory of how legislators balance the benefits of expanded committee jurisdiction against preferred policy outcomes. It shows why a)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013123305
The literature on congressional committees has largely overlooked the impact of jurisdictional fights on policy proposals and outcomes. This paper develops a theory of how legislators balance the benefits of expanded committee jurisdiction against preferred policy outcomes. It shows why a)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013067844
Presidents often attach statements to the bills they sign into law, purporting to celebrate, construe, or object to provisions in the statute. Though long a feature of U.S. lawmaking, the President has avowedly attempted to use these signing statements as tool of strategic influence over...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012453763
Presidents often attach statements to the bills they sign into law, purporting to celebrate, construe, or object to provisions in the statute. Though long a feature of U.S. lawmaking, the President has avowedly attempted to use these signing statements as tool of strategic influence over...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012945153