Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Although relative performance schemes are pervasive in organizations reliable empirical data on induced sabotage behavior is almost non-existent. We study sabotage in tournaments in a controlled laboratory experiment and are able to confirm one of the key insights from theory: effort and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013158876
A real effort experiment is investigated in which supervisors have to rate the performance of individual workers who in turn receive a bonus payment based on these ratings. We compare a baseline treatment in which supervisors were not restricted in their rating behavior to a forced distribution...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003981608
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009012187
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688490
Although relative performance schemes are pervasive in organizations reliable empirical data on induced sabotage behavior is almost non-existent. We study sabotage in tournaments in a controlled laboratory experiment and are able to confirm one of the key insights from theory: effort and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003859419
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003643627
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003906938
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009299740
A large part of the theoretical tournament literature argues that rank-order tournaments only unfold their incentive effects if the contestants all have similar prospects of winning. In heterogeneous fields, the outcome of the tournament is relatively clear and the contestants reduce their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009775243
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009680941