Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Background. This study is the first to quantify physicians' malpractice insurance limits. It also examines the connection between policy size and payments on claims, including the frequency of settlement at the policy limits and the frequency of out-of-pocket payments. Methods. Statistical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014050986
In 2003, Texas adopted House Bill 4 ("HB 4") which capped non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases and included several other smaller reforms. To proponents, HB 4 is a silver bullet, encouraging physicians to move to Texas by reducing frivolous lawsuits, preventing excessive damage...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217782
In prior research, we found that policy limits in Texas medical malpractice (“med mal”) cases often served as de facto caps on recoveries in both tried and settled cases. We also found that physicians faced little personal exposure on malpractice claims. Out-of-pocket payments (OOPPs) by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013005651
Since 1980, Illinois has experienced three med mal insurance crises – in the mid-1980s, mid-1990s, and early-2000s. Each time, Illinois responded by enacting tort reform. Using a previously unavailable database of closed medical malpractice (“med mal”) claims, maintained by the Illinois...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013006216
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003752259
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003826508
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003732167
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011740676
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012297581
Health care providers and tort reformers claim that the medical malpractice litigation system is rife with behaviors that are irrational, unpredictable, and counter-productive. They attack civil juries, asserting that verdicts are skyrocketing without reason, are highly variable, and bear little...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014054840