Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012130866
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002427605
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002071869
Individuals who are likely to realize the largest benefits from improvements in air quality often depend on other members of their households to make time or monetary contributions to their care. The presence of these dependency relationships among household members poses challenges for benefit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014203616
This paper examines a new strategy for evaluating whether the size of a new environmental regulation requires that benefit cost analyses consider general equilibrium effects. Size in the context refers to both the magnitude and distribution of cost increases across sectors and the benefits...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012980155
As we understand it, the D.C. Circuit did not allow the EPA to consider the costs of complying with ozone and PM NAAQS. As we further understand it, this legal ruling can be overturned only by this Court. As economists, we believe that the D.C. Circuit's ruling not allowing the EPA to consider...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026581
This paper reports the first comprehensive approach for measuring the general equilibrium willingness to pay for large changes in air quality. It is based on a well defined locational equilibrium model. The approach allows estimation of households' indirect utility function and the underlying...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013214586
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009243125
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003801591
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003886393