Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Acquirers do not benefit from hiring the CEOs of firms they buy, either in terms of merger announcement returns or long-run operating performance. This is especially true when the retained CEOs exhibit inferior quality (as proxied by target firm industrial efficiency or the target CEO's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012999300
We examine the effect of a CEO's military service on merger and acquisition decisions and outcomes. We find that acquirers led by CEOs with military backgrounds earn significantly higher abnormal stock returns at deal announcement, and these deals exhibit higher short-run and long-run synergies....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013092373
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009764325
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011929496
We provide evidence concerning the effect of managerial risk-taking incentives on merger and acquisition (M&A) decisions and outcomes for different types of mergers: vertical, horizontal, and diversifying. Using chief executive officer (CEO) relative inside leverage to proxy for the incentives...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012974548
We analyze the effect of directors' and officers' liability insurance (D&O insurance) on the spreads charged on bank loans. We find that higher levels of D&O insurance coverage are associated with higher loan spreads and that this relation depends on loan characteristics in economically sensible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013092799
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003485178
In about one-third of US IPOs between 1996 and 2000, executives received stock options with an exercise price set equal to the IPO offer price (rather than a price determined by the market). Among firms with such quot;IPO optionsquot;, 58 percent of top executives receive a net gain from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012735210