Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001399558
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001374707
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002422414
This paper analyzes certain important shortcomings of state competition in corporate law. In particular, we show, with respect to takeovers, states have incentives to produce rules that excessively protect incumbent managers. The development of state takeover law, we argue, is consistent with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013234931
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003816698
This paper analyzes certain important shortcomings of state competition in corporate law. In particular, we show, with respect to takeovers, states have incentives to produce rules that excessively protect incumbent managers. The development of state takeover law, we argue, is consistent with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012471028
We examine whether boards are sufficiently well-informed to make efficient decisions on CEO compensation. In order to mitigate the endogeneity of board decision on CEO compensation, we use mutual fund flow-driven trading pressure as an exogenous shock to stock price informativeness. Consistent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970983
Managerial power theory holds that structural flaws in corporate governance, such as board defenses, enable opportunistic managers to extract excessive pay. While this theory has proven highly influential, this Article argues that it fails to answer important questions. For example, how does...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012915043
We examine how boards decide on CEO compensation depending on how informative stock prices are. In order to mitigate the endogeneity of board decisions, we use extreme mutual fund flow-driven trading pressure as an exogenous shock to stock price informativeness. Consistent with informed boards...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012905487
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009511552