Showing 1 - 10 of 25
A larger CEO network can reduce the cost of equity by reducing information asymmetry between the firm and outsiders, and by increasing trust between the firm and stakeholders. Alternatively, a larger CEO network can increase the cost of equity because higher CEO connectedness encourages greater...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012859241
Directors are more likely to obtain additional directorships, especially at prestigious firms, if the CEOs of their current boards are well-connected. Recommended directors do not become beholden to the CEO, as CEO compensation is unaffected and an analysis of appointment announcement returns...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011899609
We examine the value impact of independent directors nominated by activists (Activist IDs). Firms appointing Activist IDs experience larger value increases than firms appointing other directors, particularly when Activist IDs have private firm experience and when their nominators remain as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013270309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014423574
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014475858
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003860029
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003404454
We examine how real investment decisions of younger and older Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) are affected by their career concerns. Relative to their older counterparts, younger CEOs are more likely to enter new lines of business and exit from existing ones. They prefer growth through...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014044024
Outside directors have incentives to resign to protect their reputation or to avoid an increase in their workload when they anticipate that the firm on whose board they sit will perform poorly or disclose adverse news. We call these incentives the dark side of outside directors. We find strong...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013038902