Showing 1 - 10 of 17
Purchasing power adjusted incomes applied in cross-country comparisons are measured with bias. In this paper, we estimate the purchasing power parity (PPP) bias in Penn World Table incomes and provide corrected incomes. The bias is substantial and systematic: the poorer a country, the more its...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008732283
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734145
Since the late 1970s, the price indices underlying the poverty lines in India have been updated using aggregate indices. Widespread criticism of these indices led to the adoption of a new official methodology in 2011 based on unit values from consumption survey data. We propose an alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013086396
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009706175
Since the late 1970s, the price indices underlying the poverty lines in India have been updated using aggregate indices. Widespread criticism of these indices led to the adoption of a new official methodology in 2011 based on unit values from consumption survey data. We propose an alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009707597
Estimates of poverty are highly sensitive to price and income measures across time and space. This paper offers a complementary approach to traditional poverty measurement that ensures comparability: we use nighttime light as a proxy for poverty measurement. We measure the percentage of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010367372
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003511803
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003735992
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011422585
It is well known that people’s consumption patterns change with income. Relative price changes therefore affect rich and poor consumers differently. Yet, the standard price indices are not income-specific and hence, the use of these mask these differences in cost-of-living. In this paper, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011421580