Showing 1 - 10 of 20
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001690959
We analyze a Bayesian merger game under two-sided asymmetric information about firm types. We show that the standard prediction of the lemons market model–if any, only low-type firms are traded–is likely to be misleading: Merger returns, i.e. the difference between pre- and post-merger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002202342
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003773442
We consider a setting in which two potential merger partners each possess private information pertaining both to the profitability of the merged entity and to stand-alone profits, and we investigate the extent to which this private information makes ex-post regret an unavoidable phenomenon in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003387546
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003876939
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394756
This paper provides a novel theory of research joint ventures for financially constrained firms. When firms choose R&D portfolios, an RJV can help to coordinate research efforts, reducing investments in duplicate projects. This can free up resources, increase the variety of pursued projects and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013362245
This paper surveys experimental literature relating to mergers. We put particular emphasis on discussing whether this literature addresses the issues that are relevant for competition policy. We also include some suggestions as to how the fit between the experiments and the requirements of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014059392
This paper provides a theory of strategic innovation project choice by incumbents and start-ups which serves as a foundation for the analysis of acquisition policy. We show that prohibiting acquisitions has a weakly negative innovation effect. We provide conditions determining the size of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012584096
This paper provides a theory of strategic innovation project choice by incumbents and start-ups. We show that prohibiting killer acquisitions strictly reduces the variety of innovation projects. By contrast, we find that prohibiting other acquisitions only has a weakly negative innovation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012263689