Showing 1 - 6 of 6
We consider second-degree price discrimination for two types of consumers. When the net-of-cost valuation functions cross at least once at some positive quantity, it is always optimal to serve both types of consumers. Moreover, the type with the higher valuation peak always gets the socially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013022346
We compare second-degree price discrimination with uniform pricing using two linear demands. Our comparison shows that second-degree price discrimination can result in a welfare-enhancing market foreclosure (both markets are served under uniform pricing but one of them is excluded under...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012897081
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012819302
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011560970
By focusing on the two intercepts — the price and quantity intercepts — of inverse linear demands, this note shows that compared to uniform pricing, third-degree price discrimination can be neutral. When all price intercepts of sub-markets' inverse demands are the same, not only will all the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012833401
We question the prevailing wisdom that a profit-maximizing monopolist using linear pricing cannot produce socially efficient output. We show that when market demand function exhibits a flat portion, the prevailing wisdom may not be true. Such a flat portion in demand is consistent with weakly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012834034