Showing 1 - 10 of 34
Economic theory suggests that monopoly prices hurt consumers but benefit shareholders. But in a world where individuals or households can be both consumers and shareholders, the impact of market power on inequality depends in part on the relative distribution of consumption and corporate equity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011958679
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012117567
Economic theory suggests that monopoly prices hurt consumers but benefit shareholders. But in a world where individuals or households can be both consumers and shareholders, the impact of market power on inequality depends in part on the relative distribution of consumption and corporate equity...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011942732
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012204051
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009297190
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003507350
A model is provided whereby a monopolist firm chooses to price its product at zero. This outcome is shown to be driven by the assumption of 'free disposal' alongside selection markets (where prices impact on a firm's costs). Free disposal creates a mass point of consumers whose utility from the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480428
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012166711
Mobile app commissions paid by app developers to a monopolist device maker/app store operator are examined. Three results are demonstrated. First, unregulated app commissions are set at a level that maximises consumer surplus. Second, eliminating app commissions will lead to higher device...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014528379
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014296899