Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014364414
Inference based on cluster-robust standard errors is known to fail when the number of clusters is small, and the wild cluster bootstrap fails dramatically when the number of treated clusters is very small. We propose a family of new procedures called the sub- cluster wild bootstrap. In the case...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011528395
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011689759
Inference for estimates of treatment effects with clustered data requires great care when treatment is assigned at the group level. This is true for both pure treatment models and difference-in-differences regressions. Even when the number of clusters is quite large, cluster-robust standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011722291
When there are few treated clusters in a pure treatment or difference-in-differences setting, t tests based on a cluster-robust variance estimator (CRVE) can severely over-reject. Although procedures based on the wild cluster bootstrap often work well when the number of treated clusters is not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011809450
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012166605
The cluster robust variance estimator (CRVE) relies on the number of clusters being large. The precise meaning of 'large' is ambiguous, but a shorthand 'rule of 42' has emerged in the literature. We show that this rule depends crucially on the assumption of equal-sized clusters. Monte Carlo...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009781104
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013448032