Showing 1 - 10 of 20
We consider multiple-principal multiple-agent models of moral hazard: principals compete through mechanisms in the presence of agents who take unobservable actions. In this context, we provide a rationale for restricting principals to make use of simple mechanisms, which correspond to direct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009150956
We consider multiple-principal multiple-agent models of moral hazard: Principals compete through mechanisms in the presence of agents who take unobservable actions. In this context, we provide a rationale for restricting principals to make use of simple mechanisms, which correspond to direct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013123960
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003382788
We provide two examples in a pure moral hazard setting with two principals and two agents. Example 1 shows that a strongly robust equilibrium in simple (direct) mechanisms can no longer be sustained as an equilibrium when a principal can deviate to an indirect communication scheme. Conversely,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014064609
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003397717
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014055134
In multiple-principal multiple-agent models of moral hazard, we provide sufficient conditions for the outcomes of pure-strategy equilibria in direct mechanisms to be preserved when principals can offer indirect communication schemes. The conditions include strong robustness in the direct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005404524
We consider multiple-principal multiple-agent models of moral hazard: principals compete through mechanisms in the presence of agents who take unobservable actions. In this context, we provide a rationale for restricting principals to make use of simple mechanisms, which correspond to direct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010994716
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002797205
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003929827