Showing 1 - 10 of 24
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001232547
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001585556
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001226752
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001767022
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001880745
We define a refinement of Nash equilibria called metastability. This refinement supposes that the given game might be embedded within any global game that leaves its local bestreply correspondence unaffected. A selected set of equilibria is metastable if it is robust against perturbations of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027102
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027692
This paper describes ways that the definition of an equilibrium among players' strategies in a game can be sharpened by invoking additional criteria derived from decision theory. Refinements of John Nash's 1950 definition aim primarily to distinguish equilibria in which implicit commitments are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027693
Two assumptions are used to justify selection of equilibria in stable sets. One assumption requires that a selected set is invariant to addition of redundant strategies. The other is a strong version of backward induction. Backward induction is interpreted as the requirement that behavior...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027770
We impose three conditions on refinements of the Nash equilibria of finite games with perfect recall that select closed connected subsets, called solutions. A. Each equilibrium in a solution uses undominated strategies; B. Each solution contains a quasi-perfect equilibrium; C. The solutions of a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013134613