Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Most of the economic literature on bargaining has focused on situations where the set of possible outcomes is taken as given. This paper is concerned with situations where decision-makers first need to identify the set of feasible outcomes before they bargain over which of them is selected. Our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014186265
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008932996
Most of the economic literature on bargaining has focused on situations where the set of possible outcomes is taken as given. This paper is concerned with situations where decision-makers first need to identify the set of feasible outcomes before they bargain over which of them is selected. Our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008908890
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011385756
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003407992
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011525316
I prove that the Nash bargaining solution is the only solution to satisfy 'Disagreement Point Convexity' and 'Midpoint Domination.' I explain how this improves previous results obtained by Chun (1990) and by Dagan et al. (2002)
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014064864
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001780933
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001565886
In this paper we discuss a new tort liability rule, which we call super-symmetric comparative negligence and vigilance. When both injurer and victim in an accident are negligent, it provides for liability shares that depend on the degrees of negligence of the two parties, similar to the standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005249423