Showing 1 - 10 of 27
In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the nature of causation between resource dependence and civil war is opposite to conventional wisdom. In particular, (i) civil war creates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014221042
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003761487
We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic’s popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox is a red herring. The most commonly used measure of ‘resource abundance’ can be more usefully...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003459205
We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic's popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox is a red herring. The most commonly used measure of 'resource abundance' can be more usefully interpreted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012731090
In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the conventional measure of resource dependence is endogenous with respect to conflict, and that instrumenting for dependence implies that it is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013095625
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001773289
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009308309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003908440
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009547756
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010490991