Showing 1 - 7 of 7
We propose a unified framework to study relational contracting and hold-up problems in infinite horizon stochastic games. We first illustrate that with respect to long run decisions, the common formulation of relational contracts as Pareto-optimal public perfect equilibria is in stark contrast...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010336791
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009706860
We propose a unified framework to study relational contracting and hold-up problems in infinite horizon stochastic games. We first illustrate that with respect to long run decisions, the common formulation of relational contracts as Pareto-optimal public perfect equilibria is in stark contrast...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010607540
We propose a unified framework to study relational contracting and hold-up problems in infinite horizon stochastic games. We first illustrate that with respect to long run decisions, the common formulation of relational contracts as Pareto-optimal public perfect equilibria is in stark contrast...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013087220
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009763934
Game theoretic analysis of relational contracts typically studies Pareto-optimal equilibria of infinitely repeated games. We illustrate with several examples how this equilibrium selection rules out very intuitive hold-up concerns. This becomes apparent only when moving away from the stationary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857120
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014316850