Showing 1 - 9 of 9
This paper introduces a newly digitized, open-access version of the Food and Drug Administration’s “Orange Book”—a linkage between approved small-molecule drugs and the patents that protect them. The Orange Book also reports any applicable regulatory exclusivity that prevents competitive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014242077
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009625701
This paper introduces a newly digitized, open-access version of the Food and Drug Administration's "Orange Book"--a linkage between approved small-molecule drugs and the patents that protect them. The Orange Book also reports any applicable regulatory exclusivity that prevents competitive entry....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013462677
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014316974
Observers worry that generic patent challenges are on the rise and reduce the effective market life of drugs. A related concern is that challenges disproportionately target high-sales drugs, reducing market life for these “blockbusters.” To study these questions, we examine new data on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014182616
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015404473
The Hatch-Waxman Act regulates competition between brand-name and generic drugs in the United States. We examine a feature of the Act that has attracted great controversy but little systematic attention. “Paragraph IV” challenges are a mechanism for generic drug makers to challenge the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014193396
This survey provides a detailed account of patent settlements reached between brand-name drug companies and their generic rivals over the past fourteen years, and the antitrust suits and investigations initiated in response. Thirty settlements of patent litigation involving twenty drugs fall...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014026293
Over the past decade, drug makers have settled patent litigation by making large payments to potential rivals who, in turn, abandon suits that (if successful) would increase competition. Because such "pay-for-delay" settlements postpone the possibility of competitive entry, they have attracted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014056285