Showing 1 - 10 of 26
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011460434
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011804461
We show that the standard equation-by-equation OLS used in performance evaluation ignores information in the alpha population and leads to severely biased estimates for the alpha population. We propose a new framework that treats fund alphas as random effects. Our framework allows us to make...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012995517
Our paper explores the link between cross-sectional fund return dispersion and performance evaluation. The foundation of our model is the simple intuition that in periods of high return dispersion, which is associated with high levels of idiosyncratic risk for zero-alpha funds, it is easier for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899749
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012236195
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012166855
We analyse and contrast the performance of discretionary and systematic hedge funds. Systematic funds use strategies that are rules-based, with little or no daily intervention by humans. In our experience, some large allocators shy away from systematic hedge funds altogether. A possible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012902574
Final working paper version. "" Published version: The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 31, Issue 7, July 2018, pp. 2499–2552. Past fund performance does a poor job of predicting future outcomes. The reason is noise. Using a random effects framework, we reduce the noise by pooling...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012855889
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009706279
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009696032